Original Bibel:



Manipulated Bibel:

Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus

The source of modern manipulated translations! Nowadays, almost all Bible translations have been adapted to the formulation in the Codex Sinaiticus (and Codex Vaticanus). Does this come from God? The origin of the Codex Sinaiticus was the city of Alexandria, which was a mystical-spiritualistic center of fallen Christians. Many words have been changed, to deny, that Jesus was always the literal Son of God. Interestingly, this Codex was just discovered on Mount Sinai in 1844, when God exalted His last people on Earth and His prophet Ellen White. Was that a coincidence?

Westcott and Hort corrected the King James Bible (1881 NT and 1884 AT) and replaced the Textus Receptus as a basis through the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus. This modified version from 1885 has the name “Revised Version“. The Codex Sinaiticus is serving today as the basis for almost all modern Bible translations since the beginning of the twentieth century. The theologian Dr. James R. White, director of the Alpha and Omega Ministries, described the following facts about Westcott and Hort’s translation of the Bible:

  • “Westcott and Hort use Sinaiticus and Vaticanus to elaborate the New Testament, the work that eliminates the text used in the King James Bible, later known in scientific studies as the Textus Receptus.” {Dr. James R. White: The King James Only Controversy, p. 33}
  • “We see the work of Westcott and Hort on the Greek New Testament as the central point of the effort to remove the King James Version from the throne and to replace the Greek text as its basis with the Textus Receptus.” {Dr. James R. White: The King James Only Controversy, p. 99}

Did such manipulations of the Bible by Wescott and Hort leave any consequences or influences? Wikipedia explains it best:

  • “The international committee that prepared the Greek New Testament of United Bible Societies not only took the Westcott & Hort edition as a textual basis, but also followed its methodology.” {Wikipedia: “The New Testament in the Original Greek”}

Is there real evidence that the enemy is active to change the Bible?

Helena P. Blavatsky, the founder of the anthroposophists and well-known spiritualist (“coincidentally” from the time of Ellen White) has written openly in many places that her “God” is Lucifer. She has conducted the spiritualistic séances with Wescott and Hort as well as with Charles Darwin. She wrote that Westcott and Hort were the “true” students who enabled the “errors” in the King James Bible to be eliminated, and that a “true” translation of the Bible would be based only on the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, and that this would be a “revelation” for the twentieth century, through which the Bible could finally be “better understood” because the old Protestant version of the KJB was not “compatible” with the Codex Sinaiticus from Alexandria.

She also wrote that only the occultists were “able” to save the “true” form of the Bible and that this new translation had finally broken the connection with the old translation of the King James Bible. One of the first Bibles based on the Codex Sinaiticus was the Elberfelder Bible in Germany. For this reason, the Elberfelder Bible is not recommended, although some details have been translated more precisely. These correct texts only lead a reader to view the manipulated verses as a more precise translation. Such kind of seduction has always been the enemy’s tactic. 

The Codex Vaticanus also comes from the other side! And its influence is not only found in the Catholic Bible. The Adventist theologians of today are using this newly discovered spiritualistic Codex Sinaiticus as a “proof” that Jesus is “not” a literal son.