BEGINNING OF TRINITY: Year 325 + 381

  • „And Iesus came, and spake vnto them, saying, All power is giuen vnto me in heauen and in earth. Goe ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Ghost: Teaching them to obserue all things, whatsoeuer I haue commanded you: and loe, I am with you alway, euen vnto the end of the world. Amen.“ {Matthew, 28,18.19.20}

This verse was changed in year 325 to support and introduce the Trinity doctrine. We know the following facts: the “doctrine of the Trinity” was the basis of many pagan religions alongside “life after death”. During the council in Nicea in 325, Emperor Constantine ordered that an ecumenical Bible be compiled for the purpose of uniting pagans and Christians.

He entrusted this task to the leading Bishop Eusebius of Caesarea, who implemented what Bishop Origen had tried earlier without success. It is interesting that Bishop Eusebius quoted the above verse in a different way 17 times in his works before Nicea:

  • „Surely none save our only Savior has done this, when, after his victory over death, he spoke the word to his followers, and fulfilled it by the event, saying to them, “Go ye and make disciples of all nations in my name.” {Eusebius: Oration in Praise of Emperor Constantine, Chapter 16, Section 8}
  • „Relying upon the power of Christ, who had said to them, “Go ye and make disciples of all the nations in My name.“ {Eusebius: Book III of his History, Chapter 5, Section 2, (about the Jewish persecution of early Christians)}
  • “With one word and voice He said to His disciples: “Go, and make disciples of all nations in My Name, teaching them to observe all things whats over I have commanded you” {Eusebius: Proof of the Gospel, Book III, ch 6, 132 (a), p. 152}
  • „But while the disciples of Jesus were most likely either saying thus, or thinking thus, the Master solved their difficulties, by the addition of one phrase, saying they should triumph “In MY NAME.”And the power of His name being so great, that the apostle says: “God has given him a name which is above every name, that in the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth,” He shewed the virtue of the power in His Name concealed from the crowd when He said to His disciples: “Go, and make disciples of all the nations in My Name.” He also most accurately forecasts the future when He says: “for this gospel must first be preached to all the world, for a witness to all nations.” {Eusebius: Proof of the Gospel, Book III, ch. 7, 136 (a-d), p. 157}

For this reason, it is not surprising that after the introduction of the Trinity in year 325, Eusebius suddenly changed the form of those verses, so that he used only the current form of those verses in his following 5 works. The whole Bible only knows baptism ‘in the name of Jesus’. The true Bible certainly does not contradict itself, and the verse Matthew 28:19 directly contradicts all other verses. This is the strongest evidence of the falsification. One constellation is 180 degrees different than the other, and both are impossible at the same time. God never contradicts Himself!

  • „When they heard this, they were baptized in the Name of the Lord Iesus.“ {Acts 19:5}
  • „But when they beleeued Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdome of God, and the Name of Iesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.“ {Acts 8:12}
  • „For as yet hee was fallen vpon none of them: onely they were baptized in the Name of the Lord Iesus.“ {Acts 8:16}
  • „And hee commanded them to be baptized in the Name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarie certaine dayes.“ {Acts 10:48}
  • „For as many of you as haue bene baptized into Christ, haue put on Christ.“ {Galatians 3:27}

Whose name do we call to be washed from sin at baptism? Trinity?

  • „Then Peter said vnto them, Repent, and be baptized euery one of you in the Name of Iecsus Christ, for the remission of sinnes, and ye shal receiue the gift of the holy Ghost.“ {Acts 2,38}
  • „And now, why tariest thou? Arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sinnes, calling on the name of the Lord.“ {Acts 22,16}

At the Council of Nicaea in 325, the Trinity was introduced, as in Adventism in 1931. We remember that most Adventists were against this false doctrine in 1931. That is why the Trinity had to be deepened and adopted once again (as in our country in 1941) and confirmed in 381 (in our country in 1980) at the Council of Constantinople. That the Trinity was in the Christian world until then, i.e.. before 325 or 381 it was really widespread, then it would not be necessary to adopt this science, and to impose it again after a couple of decades. With the official introduction of the week, which was already widespread as Apostasy, it was far easier. The week as a “separation from the Jews” spread more and more intensely, although it had not yet reached the critical mass of full acceptance. That is why Constantine had to introduce Sunday officially in 321 and forced everyone to keep it. 

Due to its prevalence, the resistance was much easier to break. Opposition groups that opposed these new teachings have almost completely disappeared over time, as in our church, where the Trinity was introduced only after several attempts, and later all other opposition was broken. But even such clear facts receive a different interpretation, and the fact that the pagan Apocrypha were removed in 325 is taken as “proof”. Of course, the definition of the Bible books was changed, because the false Apocrypha had already been inserted into biblical scripts, otherwise, they should not have been excluded. Only something already present can be thrown out, and something i.e. not mostly present can be introduced. If the Trinity and the celebration of the week before had been present in Christianity, there would have been no need for the introduction or dictatorial imposition of the notion of God! When someone who knew and had a complete truth falls away from it, then he becomes seven times worse than the one who is a part of Babylon. 

Even the fall of Christianity in Nicaea, despite the proclamation of the holy Spirit as a “Divine Being”, still leaves the fact that Jesus is the literal Son, and that the holy Spirit proceeds from God the Father and the Son. To this day, both the Catholic and Orthodox Churches advocate the heresy of rebirth and rebirth. The Trinity passed only when the Pope managed to exterminate all three Arian tribes that were determined against the Trinity. Almost all churches, except many Adventists, believe that Jesus on the cross literally and completely died for us! Today we are almost the only church in which, in the meantime, many theologians blasphemously declare that Jesus did not really die for us, but that he only slept in the grave, while only His fleshly garment was dead! Below we see the formulation of the theological points from Nicaea, which were then closer to the Bible than today’s teaching of the fully fulfilled Omega of the Apostasy of the last church:

  • I believe in one God the Father, the Almighty, the Creator of heaven and earth, and all things visible and invisible.
  • And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Only Begotten, by the Father begotten beforeallages; Light from Light, true God from true God, Born, not Created, one in essence with the Father, through Whom all things came into being.
  • And in the holy Spirit, the Lord of Life, who proceeds from the Father, who is honored and glorified together with the Father and the Son; who spoke through the prophets.

Likewise, in 1931, in the Adventist Church, despite the first step of apostasy through the proclamation of the Trinity, the truth remained that Jesus has always been the literal Son and that the holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son! Tertullian of Carthage (160-220), as we read from historical records, was the first person with the theory of the Trinity. We are faced with the remark that since we have such an early description of the Trinitarian doctrine in Christianity, it must be true. 

Unfortunately, the same logic is used by Darwinists, as well as most Evolutionists, that human explanations and assumptions become truths and dogmas after a certain time. Darwin was the first to try to explain the origin of plant and animal species, and other scientists have built various theories and evidence on the origin of life on Earth.

  • “The formulation ‘one God in three persons‘ was not solidly established, certainly not fully assimilated into Christian life and its profession of faith, prior to the end of the 4th century. But it is precisely this formulation that has first claim to the title the Trinitarian dogma. Among the Apostolic Fathers, there had been nothing even remotely approaching such a mentality or perspective.“ {New Catholic Encyclopedia: 1967., Vol. XIV, p. 299}

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.